ERC Consolidator Grant for Project Correcting Inequality through Law
My project on Correcting Inequality through Law: How Courts Conceptualize Equality in their Constitutional Jurisprudence will be supported by an ERC Consolidator Grant for the next five years. The project explores the meaning of equality. It analyses how apex courts conceptualize equality in constitutional and international human rights law. It will be based on a comparative study of the equality jurisprudence of 16 jurisdictions and has three aims. Firstly, it intends to create a comparative map of equality jurisprudence, i.e. to describe and categorize the constitutional jurisprudence on equality: Which doctrinal choices do courts make and how do these choices inform the conception of equality? Secondly, it seeks to explain the doctrinal choices of the analyzed courts: Which factors influence courts to arrive at particular conceptions of equality? Thirdly, it has a normative goal and examines whether courts are better suited to correct certain kinds of inequalities than other kinds of inequalities.
Review of Proportionality and Judicial Activism in I.CON
Iddo Porat published a review of my book on Proportionality and Judicial Activism in the International Journal of Constitutional Law
EJIL:Live Interview on The ICJ and the Judicial Politics of Identifying Customary International Law
Proportionality and Judicial Activism published
Cambridge University Press has published my book on Proportionality and Judicial Activism. The book addresses the question whether courts use the proportionality test as an instrument for judicial activism. It analyzes the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the apex courts of Canada, Germany, and South Africa.